MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2007811535 · doi:10.1055/s-0031-1281512

Selective Fascicular Coaptation of Free Functioning Gracilis Transfer for Restoration of Independent Thumb and Finger Flexion Following Volkmann Ischemic Contracture

2011· article· en· W2007811535 on OpenAlexaff
Ronald M. Zuker, Michael Bezuhly, Ralph T. Manktelow

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Reconstructive Microsurgery · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicNerve Injury and Rehabilitation
Canadian institutionsSickKids FoundationDalhousie UniversityHospital for Sick Children
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineThumbContractureForearmMuscle contractureTendon transferAnatomyTendonBicepsSurgeryIndex fingerHumerus

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Children are prone to developing moderate to severe Volkmann ischemic contracture following a supracondylar fracture of the humerus or its treatment. Given the variable extent of forearm muscle damage, tendon transfers and tenodeses are often unavailable. To address these contractures, intensive hand therapy and a free functioning muscle transfer are required. Despite functional improvement following free muscle transplantation, reconstructed patients with severe Volkmann ischemic contracture tend to have persistent difficulty with fine motor activities owing to the losses of intrinsic muscle function and independence of thumb and finger flexion. The authors demonstrate how selective coaptation of separate fascicular territories of the gracilis nerve branches to the branches of the anterior interosseous nerve that innervate flexor pollicis longus and flexor digitorum profundus may be performed to establish a degree of independent thumb and finger flexion with a single free gracilis transfer. This technical refinement as well as its long-term outcomes in a series of three patients is presented.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.250
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations23
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Reconstructive MicrosurgerySame topicNerve Injury and RehabilitationFrench-language works237,207