MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2007815282 · doi:10.2118/121709-pa

An Environmentally Friendly Stimulation Fluid for High-Temperature Applications

2010· article· en· W2007815282 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueSPE Journal · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicOil and Gas Production Techniques
Canadian institutionsAkzoNobel (Canada)
FundersAkzoNobel
KeywordsEthylenediaminetetraacetic acidDissolutionSolubilityChemistryChelationCalciteHydrochloric acidCarbonateCitric acidInorganic chemistryMineralogyOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Summary Matrix acidizing is used in carbonate formations to create flow channels from the formation to the wellbore; in sandstone formations, however, the goal is to dissolve materials that impair well performance. However, the use of acids in deep wells has some major drawbacks, including high reaction rate and corrosion to well tubulars. We have discovered a new stimulation chemical that can be used as a replacement for or in combination with acid treatments in deep wells. A polyacid whose structure allows for acidification is described. The polyacidic chelate L-glutamic acid, N, N-diacetic acid (GLDA) is manufactured from L-glutamic acid (MSG). The chelate-based fluid very effectively dissolves CaCO3, and it is less corrosive to the equipment and easy to handle. This paper discusses the reaction of the new chelate, GLDA, with calcite and compares its performance with other available chelates, including ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA), hydroxy-ethylethylenediaminetriacetic acid (HEDTA), nitrilotriacetic acid (NTA), and ethanoldiglycine (EDG). GLDA dissolves calcite over a wide pH interval, although it is less effective than HEDTA at pH > 5. A unique property of GLDA is its high solubility; solutions exceeding 40 wt% can be achieved at a pH of approximately 2, whereas HEDTA solubility is limited to approximately 10 wt%. A mole of GLDA with a natural pH of approximately 1.5 is capable of dissolving up to two moles of CaCO3. Throughout the pH range, GLDA appears to be as thermally stable as HEDTA. As an additive to hydrochloric acid (HCl), GLDA is as effective as HEDTA in preventing precipitation of moderate levels of Fe3+ in spent acids. At high Fe3+ concentrations, GLDA is slightly less effective than HEDTA on a molar basis; but, to deal with high Fe3+ levels, GLDA may be better because significantly higher concentrations of it are possible in various acids. In 28 wt% HCl, HEDTA has limited solubility while GLDA's solubility exceeds 40 wt%. From an environmental standpoint, GLDA is readily biodegradable and is made from a renewable raw material, monosodium glutamate. GLDA has low toxicity and aquatic toxicity characteristics. As a replacement for HCl, GLDA is significantly safer and less corrosive.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.108
Threshold uncertainty score0.266

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.003
GPT teacher head0.219
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it