P143Primary bilateral fallopian tube cancer – case report
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Introduction Fallopian tube cancer is one of the rarest neoplasm of female reproductive tract. Primary, bilateral presence of the cancer is especially rare. Diagnostic difficulties cause, that it is often found in very advanced state. The authors have presented the case of primary bilateral cancer of the fallopian tube, qualified to surgical treatment on the base of sonographic examination. 57 years‐old women was examined using transvaginal ultrasound due to increasing pain in the lower part of the abdomen and abnormal discharge out of the vagina. During the examination fluid in the uterus cavity and cystic, oblong, winding structures in both adnexa, looking like distended oviducts were found. Typical ovary tissue wasn't visible. On the base of history and examination laparotomy was ordered. During the surgery multiple adhesions in the pelvis and extended fluid filled fallopian tubes were found. The hysterectomy and bilateral adnexectomy was performed. Pathological examination revealed presence of bilateral papillary adenocarcinoma of the fallopian tubes. Out of the oviduct no neoplastic cells was found. Conclusion Extended fluid filled oviducts found during sonographic examination may be the first sign of fallopian tube cancer.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.010 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".