Atrophy among Mucosa-Only versus Muscular Mucosa Superiorly Based Pharyngeal Flaps: A Pilot Animal Study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Velopharyngeal insufficiency is frequently managed surgically via the superiorly based pharyngeal flap procedure. The flap used in this procedure traditionally consists of both mucosa and muscle. Although muscle is included to potentially increase survival and tissue bulk, its inclusion may result in postoperative dysfunction of pharyngeal sidewall motion. Although the benefits of pharyngeal flap surgery are established, the denervated muscular portion of the flap appears to atrophy. The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether a flap consisting entirely of mucosa provides the same tissue bulk as a conventional pharyngeal flap 12 weeks postoperatively. METHODS: Ten laboratory-grade cats served as direct patient surrogates. Cats were randomized to undergo a superiorly based pharyngeal flap procedure with flaps composed of either both muscle and mucosa (n = 5) or mucosa only (n = 5). Blinded volumetric analysis was performed by three board-certified neuroradiologists using magnetic resonance imaging of the pharynx immediately after surgery and at 4, 8, and 12 weeks. RESULTS: At 12 weeks postoperatively, pharyngeal flaps composed of both mucosa and muscle atrophied to reach volumetric equivalence with mucosa-only flaps. Evaluation of final pharyngeal flap volume demonstrated no statistical differences between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates equivalent final superiorly based pharyngeal flap tissue bulk for flaps composed of only mucosa when compared with conventional pharyngeal flaps. Thus, the mucosa-only pharyngeal flap may yield similar outcomes while potentially providing for an earlier return of normal pharyngeal function.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".