Characterization of Homogeneity of Bubble Flows in Bubble Columns Using RPT and Fibre Optics
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Homogeneous flows of air-water in two bubble columns, 0.130 m and 0.292 m in diameter, were investigated using RPT (radioactive particle tracking) and fibre optics. The homogeneity of bubble flows at U g < 0.04 m/s was revealed not only in the hydrodynamics of the gas/liquid phase but also in the transport phenomena (turbulence intensity ). RPT Lagrangian data derived that turbulence was about 0.15 m/s for the radial direction and 0.26~0.35 m/s for axial direction in the 0.292 m column, 0.05~0.16 m/s for the radial direction and 0.25~0.35 m/s for the axial direction in the 0.13 column. Average bubble diameter was 4~5.3 mm and was almost constant for the radial locations. The result was twice the sizes of the predicted bubble sizes in the CFD modeling. The slip velocity was 0.3 m/s at U g=0.015~0.033m/s as it was assumed in many reactor designs, and only a small variation was found at the radial locations. In flow patterns, stable circulation cells were revealed using velocity vector plots if a single nozzle sparger was used in the 0.13m column, which confirmed Joshis assumptions (Joshi and Sharma, 1979) and Lins assumption (Lin et al., 1996) based on 2-D columns. Using a perforated sparger was helpful to form a stable mean velocity field. Mean bubble diameters and bubble size distribution varied only slightly with radial/axial locations, which was consistent with the homogeneity of radial/axial turbulence. Bubble-size evolution from their formation to equilibrium mean diameter was discussed. Mean bubble size correlation was approached. The homogeneity of investigated flows was also substantiated by the criteria of stability for bubble flows.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".