Shingles in Alberta: Before and after publicly funded varicella vaccination
Bibliographic record
Abstract
PURPOSE: A universal publicly funded chickenpox vaccination program was implemented in Alberta in 2002. We examine the epidemiology of medically attended shingles in Alberta from 1994 to 2010. METHODS: Incident shingles cases (earliest health service utilizations for ICD-9 053 or ICD-10-CA B02) and their co-morbid conditions for the 12 months prior to shingles diagnosis were identified from the records of Alberta's universal, publicly funded health-care insurance system for 1994-2010. Shingles diagnostic codes at least 180 days after the first were classified as recurrent episodes. Denominators for rates were estimated using mid-year population estimates from the Alberta Health Care Insurance Plan Registry. Annual age- and sex-specific rates were estimated. We estimated the proportion of all cases that were hospitalized. We explored the pattern of rates for sex, age-group co-morbidity and year effects and their interactions. RESULTS: Crude rates of shingles increased over the interval 1994-2010. Most persons had only a single episode of shingles; 4% of cases were hospitalized. Shingles rates were higher among females than males. While only 2% of shingles cases had one or more co-morbidities, this proportion was also higher for females than males. Prior to 2002, all age groups of both sexes experienced increasing annual rates of shingles. However, there was a sharp decline in the rate of shingles for both females and males under the age of 10 years for 2002-2010, the period in which there was publicly funded chickenpox vaccination. CONCLUSION: The declining rates of shingles among persons under the age of 10 years are consistent with an impact of the chickenpox vaccination program. The trend of increasing rates of shingles among older persons began prior to implementation of vaccination.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".