Manganese Valence in Oxides Formed from in Situ Chemical Oxidation of TCE by KMnO<sub>4</sub>
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Batch and column experiments designed to simulate in situ chemical oxidation (ISCO) in a sand aquifer were conducted to create Mn-oxides (MnOx) by oxidation of trichloroethylene (TCE) with permanganate (MnO4-). Electron energy-loss spectroscopy (EELS) and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) were used to quantify Mn valence in the oxides. The valence of Mn in the MnOx generated in near-source ISCO conditions was 2.2 and 2.3 when formed at low (<3) and neutral (6-7) pH conditions, respectively. There is no significant difference between these values. Valence was found to be sensitive to the preparation method and to aging. When formed in the presence of excess MnO4-, or aged for 3 months, Mn valence ranged from 2.5 to 3.6. Aging in a lower pH environment inhibited Mn oxidation. The EELS and XPS methods provided similar results, but there was a slight bias to higher values for XPS. This work demonstrates that MnO2(s) may not be the main product of MnO4- reaction with chlorinated solvents as is commonly assumed and that the efficiency of ISCO treatment may be greater than previously known.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".