Repopulating defect of mismatch repair–deficient hematopoietic stem cells
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Mismatch repair deficiency is associated with carcinogenesis, increased spontaneous and induced mutagenesis, and resistance to methylating agents. In humans, leukemias and lymphomas arise in the background of mismatch repair deficiency, raising the possibility that hematopoiesis is abnormal as well. To address hematopoiesis in MSH2-/- mice, we collected marrow and performed serial transplantations of these cells, alone or mixed with wild-type cells, into lethally irradiated healthy mice. Transplant recipients were observed or treated with the methylating agent, temozolomide (TMZ). Methylating agent tolerance was evident by the competitive survival advantage of MSH2-/- marrow progenitors compared with wild-type cells after each TMZ exposure. However, serial repopulation by MSH2-/- cells was deficient compared with wild-type cells. In recipients of mixed populations, the MSH 2-/- cells were lost from the marrow, and mice receiving MSH2-/- cells plus TMZ could not be reconstituted in the third passage, whereas all wild-type cell recipients survived. No differences in telomere length, cell cycle distribution, or homing were observed, but an increase in microsatellite instability was seen in the MSH2-/- early progenitor colony-forming unit (CFU) and Sca+Kit+lin--derived clones. Thus, mismatch repair deficiency is associated with a hematopoietic repopulation defect and stem cell exhaustion because of accumulation of genomic instability.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".