MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2008035364 · doi:10.1074/jbc.m112.395939

Critical Hydrogen Bond Formation for Activation of the Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor

2012· article· en· W2008035364 on OpenAlexafffund
Jérôme Cabana, Brian J. Holleran, Marie-Ève Beaulieu, Richard Leduc, Emanuel Escher, Gaétan Guillemette, Pierre Lavigne

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Biological Chemistry · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicReceptor Mechanisms and Signaling
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Sherbrooke
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsChemistryReceptorAngiotensin II receptor type 15-HT5A receptorEnzyme-linked receptorAsparagineHydrogen bondTransmembrane domainProtease-activated receptor 2MutantAngiotensin IIAgonistResidue (chemistry)StereochemistryBiophysicsBiochemistryAmino acidBiologyMolecule

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

G protein-coupled receptors contain selectively important residues that play central roles in the conformational changes that occur during receptor activation. Asparagine 111 (N111 3.35 ) is such a residue within the angiotensin II type 1 (AT 1 ) receptor. Substitution of N111 3.35 for glycine leads to a constitutively active receptor, whereas substitution for tryptophan leads to an inactivable receptor. Here, we analyzed the AT 1 receptor and two mutants (N111G and N111W) by molecular dynamics simulations, which revealed a novel molecular switch involving the strictly conserved residue D74 2.50 . Indeed, D74 2.50 forms a stable hydrogen bond (H-bond) with the residue in position 111 3.35 in the wild-type and the inactivable receptor. However, in the constitutively active mutant N111G-AT 1 receptor, residue D74 is reoriented to form a new H-bond with another strictly conserved residue, N46 1.50 . When expressed in HEK293 cells, the mutant N46G-AT 1 receptor was poorly activable, although it retained a high binding affinity. Interestingly, the mutant N46G/N111G-AT 1 receptor was also inactivable. Molecular dynamics simulations also revealed the presence of a cluster of hydrophobic residues from transmembrane domains 2, 3, and 7 that appears to stabilize the inactive form of the receptor. Whereas this hydrophobic cluster and the H-bond between D74 2.50 and W111 3.35 are more stable in the inactivable N111W-AT 1 receptor, the mutant N111W/F77A-AT 1 receptor, designed to weaken the hydrophobic core, showed significant agonist-induced signaling. These results support the potential for the formation of an H-bond between residues D74 2.50 and N46 1.50 in the activation of the AT 1 receptor. Background: The N111G and N111W mutations make the AT 1 receptor constitutively active and inactivable, respectively. Results: The orientation and interactions of D74 2.50 are influenced by the residue at position 111 3.35 . Conclusion: H-bond formation between D74 2.50 and N46 1.50 is critical for AT 1 receptor activation. Significance: This novel molecular switch could be involved in the GPCR activation mechanism as it involves highly conserved residues D 2.50 and N 1.50 .

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.270
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations21
Published2012
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Biological ChemistrySame topicReceptor Mechanisms and SignalingFrench-language works237,207