Fluorescence Energy Transfer Studies of Human Deoxycytidine Kinase: Role of Cysteine 185 in the Conformational Changes that Occur upon Substrate Binding
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Human deoxycytidine kinase (dCK) phosphorylates both pyrimidine and purine deoxynucleosides, including numerous nucleoside analogue prodrugs. Energy transfer studies of transfer between Trp residues of dCK and the fluorescent probe N-(1-pyrene)maleimide (PM), which specifically labels Cys residues in proteins, were performed. Two of the six Cys residues in dCK were labeled, yielding a protein that was functionally active. We determined the average distances between PM-labeled Cys residues and Trp residues in dCK in the absence and presence of various pyrimidine and purine nucleoside analogues with the Trp residues as energy donors and PM-labeled Cys residues as acceptors. The transfer efficiency was determined from donor intensity quenching and the Förster distance R(0) at which the efficiency of energy transfer is 50%, which was 19.90 A for dCK-PM. The average distance R between the Trp residues and the labeled Cys residues in dCK-PM was 18.50 A, and once substrates bound, this distance was reduced, demonstrating conformational changes. Several of the Cys residues of dCK were mutated to Ala, and the properties of the purified mutant proteins were studied. PM labeled a single Cys residue in Cys-185-Ala dCK, suggesting that one of the two Cys residues labeled in wild-type dCK was Cys 185. The distance between the single PM-labeled Cys residue and the Trp residues in Cys-185-Ala dCK was 20.75 A. Binding of nucleosides had no effect on the pyrene fluorescence of Cys-185-Ala dCK, indicating that the conformational changes observed upon substrate binding to wild-type dCK-PM involved the "lid region" of which Cys 185 is a part. The substrate specificity of Cys-185-Ala dCK was altered in that dAdo and UTP were better substrates for the mutant than for the wild-type enzyme.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".