Bibliographic record
Abstract
The panorama is an art form, which grew significantly in importance during the nineteenth century. A summary of this evolution is offered, especially with relation to the Alps. Although some similarities exist between the Alps and the Scottish mountains in their history and growth of mountaineering and tourism, perhaps surprisingly this does not include the tourist panorama. Some examples of Scottish panoramas (and of similar pictorial forms) from the nineteenth and early twentieth centuries are described, but there is no evidence of a demand for their mass production as occurred in the Alps. The nature and significance of more recent panoramic images of Scottish mountains are examined, and their potential value for both visitors and the environment in the future. Le panorama est une forme d'art qui a significativement prit de l'importance durant le 19e sicle. Un rsum de cette volution est propos ici, et traite plus particulirement des Alpes. Il existe des similarits entre les Alpes et les montagnes cossaises en ce qui concerne leur histoire et l'augmentation du tourisme et des activits de montagne. Cependant, il n'y aucune similitude concernant les panoramas touristiques. En effet, mªme s'il existe en Ecosse quelques exemples de panoramas ou de formes picturales comparables au 19e et au dbut du 20e sicle, il n'existe aucune preuve vidente de leur fabrication en srie, comme dans les Alpes. La nature et la signification de panoramas cossais plus rcents sont analyss ici, ainsi que leur valeur potentielle pour les utilisateurs et l'environnement futur.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".