MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2008213202 · doi:10.1080/15216540211469

tRNALys3: The Primer tRNA for Reverse Transcription in HIV‐1

2002· review· en· W2008213202 on OpenAlexaff
Lawrence Kleiman

Bibliographic record

VenueIUBMB Life · 2002
Typereview
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicHIV Research and Treatment
Canadian institutionsJewish General Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTransfer RNAPrimer binding siteRNAReverse transcriptasePrimer (cosmetics)BiologyNucleotideTranscription (linguistics)Molecular biologyChemistryCell biologyGeneticsGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

During the assembly of HIV-1, tRNA(Lys) isoacceptors are selectively packaged into the virion, and one of these, tRNA(Lys3), is annealed to the viral RNA genome where it acts to prime the reverse transcriptase (RT)-catalyzed synthesis of viral DNA. We review herein what is known about the selective packaging and annealing of primer tRNA(Lys3). Current evidence suggests that a complex of two major precursor viral proteins, Pr55gag and Pr160(gag-pol), interact with a tRNA(Lys)/lysyl-tRNA synthetase (LysRS) complex during viral assembly, with Pr55gag interacting with both LysRS and Pr160(gag-pol), and RT sequences within Pr160(gag-pol) binding to tRNA(Lys). LysRS appears to target the tRNA(Lys) isoacceptors for incorporation into HIV-1. In the virion, the 3' terminal 18 nucleotides of tRNA(Lys3) anneals to an 18-nucleotide sequence at the 5' terminal region of viral RNA termed the primer binding site (PBS). Evidence is presented that other regions on the tRNA(Lys3) also anneal with other regions in viral RNA upstream of the PBS, resulting in a destabilized tRNA(Lys3) structure. Both viral and tRNA(Lys3) regions need to be denatured to establish annealing, and the roles of both viral and cellular proteins in this process are discussed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.894
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.099
GPT teacher head0.347
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations48
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIUBMB LifeSame topicHIV Research and TreatmentFrench-language works237,207