Molecular dissection of the inward rectifier potassium current (<i>I</i><sub>K1</sub>) in rabbit cardiomyocytes: evidence for heteromeric co‐assembly of K<sub>ir2.1</sub> and K<sub>ir2.2</sub>
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cardiac inward rectifier K+ currents (IK1) play an important role in maintaining resting membrane potential and contribute to late phase repolarization. Members of the Kir2.x channel family appear to encode for IK1. The purpose of this study was to determine the molecular composition of cardiac IK1 in rabbit ventricle. Western blots revealed that Kir2.1 and Kir2.2, but not Kir2.3, are expressed in rabbit ventricle. Culturing rabbit myocytes resulted in an approximately 50% reduction of IK1 density after 48 or 72 h in culture which was associated with an 80% reduction in Kir2.1, but no change in Kir2.2, protein expression. Dominant-negative (DN) constructs of Kir2.1, Kir2.2 and Kir2.3 were generated and tested in tsA201 cells. Adenovirus-mediated over-expression of Kir2.1dn, Kir2.2dn or Kir2.1dn plus Kir2.2dn in cultured rabbit ventricular myocytes reduced IK1 density equally by 70% 72 h post-infection, while AdKir2.3dn had no effect, compared to green fluorescent protein (GFP)-infected myocytes. Previous studies indicate that the [Ba2+] required for half-maximum block (IC50) differs significantly between Kir2.1, Kir2.2 and Kir2.3 channels. The dependence of IK1 on [Ba2+] revealed a single binding isotherm which did not change with time in culture. The IC50 for block of IK1 was also unaffected by expression of the different DN genes after 72 h in culture. Taken together, these results demonstrate functional expression of Kir2.1 and Kir2.2 in rabbit ventricular myocytes and suggest that macroscopic IK1 is predominantly composed of Kir2.1 and Kir2.2 heterotetramers.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".