MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2008310025 · doi:10.5414/cnp68010

Cinacalcet HCl (Sensipar/ Mimpara) is an effective chronic therapy for hemodialysis patients with secondary hyperparathyroidism

2007· article· en· W2008310025 on OpenAlexaff
J. Reid Sterrett, J. Strøm, Hans Krister Stummvoll, Udo Bahner, A. P. S. Disney, Stephen Soroka, Cindy L Corpier, J.A. Arruda, L. E. Schwanauer, Preston Klassen, Kurt Olson, Geoffrey A. Block

Bibliographic record

VenueClinical Nephrology · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicParathyroid Disorders and Treatments
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCinacalcetMedicineSecondary hyperparathyroidismPlaceboUrologyHemodialysisCalcimimeticHyperparathyroidismInternal medicineVitamin D and neurologyNephrologyParathyroid hormoneGastroenterologySurgeryCalcium

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

AIMS: This 1-year double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter study evaluated the long-term safety and efficacy of cinacalcet for the treatment of secondary hyperparathyroidism in patients receiving hemodialysis. METHOD: Patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to cinacalcet or control treatment groups. The initial dose of cinacalcet (or matching placebo) was 30 mg. Doses were titrated every 3 or 4 weeks based on the intact parathyroid hormone (iPTH) response and safety profile. Sequential doses included 30, 60, 90, 120 and 180 mg/d. Phosphate binders and vitamin D sterols were adjusted per protocol as needed to control levels of calcium and phosphorus. Efficacy and safety were compared between treatment groups among patients who completed the study (52 total weeks of treatment). Reasons for withdrawal are presented for patients who did not complete the study. RESULTS: A total of 210 patients completed 52 weeks of double-blinded treatment with cinacalcet (n = 99) or placebo (n = 111). Over the last 6 months of the study, a greater proportion of patients in the cinacalcet group than the control group achieved an iPTH level < or = 250 pg/ml (61.6 vs. 9.9%, p < 0.001) or a > or = 30% decrease in iPTH from baseline (81.8 vs. 21.6%, p < 0.001). Mean iPTH levels decreased by -47.8% in the cinacalcet group and increased by +12.9% in the control group. Mean percentage changes in other laboratory values in the cinacalcet and control groups included the following: serum calcium -6.5 vs. +0.9% (p < 0.001), serum phosphorus -3.6 vs. -1.1% (p = 0.465), and Ca x P -9.9 vs. -0.3% (p = 0.006). The most commonly reported adverse events related to study drug by the investigators included nausea (13% cinacalcet, 5% control), investigator-reported hypocalcemia (11% cinacalcet, 1% control), vomiting (9% cinacalcet, 2% control), dyspepsia (5% cinacalcet, 4% control), and diarrhea (5% cinacalcet, 2% control). CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with cinacalcet is a safe and effective therapy for long-term control of secondary hyperparathyroidism. 1-year therapy with cinacalcet was associated with sustained, clinically significant reductions in calcium, Ca x P and iPTH which allowed a greater percentage of patients to achieve NKF-KDOQI target goals for PTH and Ca x P.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Non-randomized trial · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.358
Teacher spread0.332 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNon-randomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations50
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueClinical NephrologySame topicParathyroid Disorders and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207