MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2008314296 · doi:10.1088/0954-3899/31/10/114

Testing the integration of BaF<sub>2</sub>detectors into the 8π array: fast-timing measurements at TRIUMF

2005· article· en· W2008314296 on OpenAlexaff
Spencer J. Williams, P.M. Jenneson, P. E. Garrett, P. H. Regan, C. Andreoiu, G. C. Ball, R. S. Chakrawarthy, J. J. Daoud, G. F. Grinyer, G. Hackman, B. Hyland, N.A. Mlwilo, A. C. Morton, C. J. Pearson, J. J. Ressler, M. A. Schumaker, M. B. Smith, C. E. Svensson, J.J. Valiente Dobón

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Physics G Nuclear and Particle Physics · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicNuclear Physics and Applications
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser UniversityUniversity of GuelphTRIUMF
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSemiconductor detectorDetectorGermaniumFull width at half maximumPhysicsPicosecondSpectrometerOpticsNuclear physicsOptoelectronics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BaF2 detectors for picosecond gamma-ray decay lifetime measurements have been installed into the 8π gamma-ray spectrometer as a proof-of-principle for a possible installation of a full array of ten detectors. Using four detectors a test measurement of the half-life of the 2+ state in 152Sm resulted in a value of 1.33(6) ns, compared with a published value of 1.396 ns. Measurements with a 26Na stopped beam were performed with various master-trigger conditions. Using a master trigger of germanium–SCEPTAR–BaF2 OR BaF2–BaF2, the FWHM of the BaF2–BaF2 triggered events was found to be ∼290 ps compared with ∼1.9 ns for the germanium–SCEPTAR–BaF2 triggered events. Simulations using GEANT4 of a suggested BaF2 lifetime measurement system have been carried out. These illustrate the considerable gain in spectrum quality which can be expected using simple add-back protocols.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.226
Threshold uncertainty score0.497

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.052
GPT teacher head0.265
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Physics G Nuclear and Particle PhysicsSame topicNuclear Physics and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207