MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Sea Ice Products for EUMETSAT Satellite Application Facility

2001· article· en· W2008357767 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
L.-A. Breivik, Steinar Eastwood, Øystein Godøy, Harald Schyberg, S. B. Andersen, Rasmus Tonboe

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Remote Sensing · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicArctic and Antarctic ice dynamics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSatelliteSea iceGeographyRemote sensingOceanographyEnvironmental scienceMeteorologyGeologyEngineeringAerospace engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Le projet Océan et glace de mer (Ocean and Sea Ice project) du Centre SAF (Satellite Application Facility) est mené par EUMETSAT (European Meteorological Satellite Organization) et un consortium de centres météorologiques nationaux sousa l'égide de Météo France. À titre de membres de ce réseau, les Instituts météorologiques de Norvège et du Danemark ont développé et implanté des méthodes automatiques et opérationnelles pour la détermination des conditions de glace de mer à partir de données satellitaires. Un algorithme SSM/I amélioré de la concentration de glace et une nouvelle méthode multi-capteurs pour l'estimation du couvert de glace de mer à partir de données SSM/I, de scattéromètre et AVHRR ont été développés et testés. Dans cet article, on présente les produits concernant la glace de mer développés par le SAF avec une description des méthodes et quelques exemples.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.045
Threshold uncertainty score0.152

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0450.041

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.208
Teacher spread0.192 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations32
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Remote SensingSame topicArctic and Antarctic ice dynamicsFrench-language works237,207