Bibliographic record
Abstract
This book offers a collection of essays dealing with very specific aspects of Canadian Baptist history and represents the first volume in the Canadian Baptist Historical Society Series sponsored by McMaster Divinity College in Hamilton, Ontario, Canada. The chapters were first presented as papers at the Canadian Baptist Historical Society in sessions aimed at expanding knowledge and analysis of areas of Canadian Baptist history that have often been overlooked by scholars. Particular attention is given to the role of Baptists in Canadian culture and the varied responses of certain Baptists in the public square. The editorial team includes Gordon L. Heath, associate professor of Christian History at McMaster Divinity College, and Paul R. Wilson, longtime director/professor of General Education Studies at Heritage College and Seminary, now an independent scholar. The essays are written by an outstanding group of contributors with a variety of specializations in Canadian history, politics, and Baptist studies. Sharon M. Bowler's chapter explores the work of Baptist educator Jonathan Woolverton (1811–1883), whose work gives evidence of developments in Canadian education on the local level, an often overlooked area of scholarly investigation. Woolverton was a local school superintendent during the 1850s and 1860s, bringing his Baptist ideals to bear on an educational philosophy that emphasized instructing and mentoring the “whole person: physical, social, emotional, intellectual, and spiritual” (p. 33). Bowler's use of private diaries in developing her research also offers insight into the use of that literary genre for these studies.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".