Evidence for a Triplex DNA Conformation at the bcl-2 Major Breakpoint Region of the t(14;18) Translocation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The most common chromosomal translocation in cancer, t(14;18), occurs at the bcl-2 major breakpoint region (Mbr) in follicular lymphomas. The 150-bp bcl-2 Mbr, which contains three breakage hotspots (peaks), has a single-stranded character and, hence, a non-B DNA conformation both in vivo and in vitro. Here, we use gel assays and electron microscopy to show that a triplex-specific antibody binds to the bcl-2 Mbr in vitro. Bisulfite reactivity shows that the non-B DNA structure is favored by, but not dependent upon, supercoiling and suggests a possible triplex conformation at one portion of the Mbr (peak I). We have used circular dichroism to test whether the predicted third strand of that suggested structure can indeed form a triplex with the duplex at peak I, and it does so with 1:1 stoichiometry. Using an intracellular minichromosomal assay, we show that the non-B DNA structure formation is critical for the breakage at the bcl-2 Mbr, because a 3-bp mutation that disrupts the putative peak I triplex also markedly reduces the recombination of the Mbr. A three-dimensional model of such a triplex is consistent with bond length, bond angle, and energetic restrictions (stacking and hydrogen bonding). We infer that an imperfect purine/purine/pyrimidine (R.R.Y) triplex likely forms at the bcl-2 Mbr in vitro, and in vivo recombination data favor this as the major DNA conformation in vivo as well.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".