MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2008442764 · doi:10.1063/1.3505321

Isotope effects in liquid water by infrared spectroscopy. IV. No free OH groups in liquid water

2010· article· en· W2008442764 on OpenAlexaff
Jean-Joseph Ma×, Camille Chapados

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Chemical Physics · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicSpectroscopy and Quantum Chemical Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Trois-Rivières
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInfrared spectroscopyChemistryAnalytical Chemistry (journal)InfraredSpectroscopyCovalent bondMethanolAbsorption spectroscopyChromatographyOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The presence of free OH (OH not H-bonded) in bulk water is a key element for the determination of its molecular structure. The OH covalent bond infrared (IR) absorption is highly sensitive to the molecular environment. For this reason, IR spectroscopy is used for the determination of free OH. A workable definition of this is obtained with methanol (MeOH) in hexane where minute quantities of free OH are present. These absorb at 3654 cm(-1) (a 27 cm(-1) redshift from the gas position) with a full width at half height of 35 cm(-1). The IR spectrum of water between room temperature and 95 °C does not display such a band near 3650 cm(-1). This indicates that we do not see, in the IR spectra, the "free" OH group. From this we conclude that it is not present in liquid water at least down to the 1000 ppm level which is the limit of detectivity of our spectrometer. Other spectroscopic considerations of methanol and water in acetonitrile solutions indicate that weak H-bonds are also not present in liquid water.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.052
Threshold uncertainty score0.690

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.222
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations32
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Chemical PhysicsSame topicSpectroscopy and Quantum Chemical StudiesFrench-language works237,207