MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Serviceability and Structural Behavior of FRP-RC Beams under Different Weathering Conditions and Fatigue

2014· article· en· W2008487870 on OpenAlexaffabout
Arash Rahmatian, Ashutosh Bagchi, Michelle Nokken

Bibliographic record

VenueApplied Mechanics and Materials · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicStructural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsServiceability (structure)CrackingStructural engineeringMaterials scienceFibre-reinforced plasticDeflection (physics)Precast concreteService lifeComposite materialFlexural strengthGeotechnical engineeringEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This research encompasses structural behavior of FRP-RC beams under fatigue and different conditioning. Twelve beams were designed, casted, and after 28 days, subjected to pre-cracking. This pre-cracking was designed to simulate the expected flexure cracks in service and to enhance the effects of subsequent exposure. The beams were then exposed to one of the following four conditions: control (indoor lab environment), immersion in alkaline solution, cyclic immersion in alkali solution (Wet and Dry or W&D condition), and outdoor exposure (local Montreal climate) for 14 month .Two potentiometers installed after pre-cracking at the mid-span for flexural crack and at the shear span and after every 50-100 thousands cycles crack mouth opening displacement (CMOD) measured .Deflection of the mid-span recorded at the same time and degradation of crack, and deflection versus number of cycles and life-span prediction with considering service limit state (SLS) elaborated in this research.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.051
Threshold uncertainty score0.646

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.222
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2014
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueApplied Mechanics and MaterialsSame topicStructural Behavior of Reinforced ConcreteFrench-language works237,207