MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2008503693 · doi:10.4141/s00-047

The contribution of shrinkage cracks to bypass flow during simulated and natural rainfall experiments in northeastern Mexico

2002· article· en· W2008503693 on OpenAlexaffvenue
José Návar, J. Pena Mendez, Rorke B. Bryan

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Soil Science · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSoil and Unsaturated Flow
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVertisolSurface runoffShrinkageInfiltration (HVAC)Hydrology (agriculture)Environmental scienceStormGeologyAridSoil scienceGeotechnical engineeringSoil waterMaterials scienceMeteorologyGeographyEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Understanding the spatial and temporal dynamics of desiccation cracks and related hydro-geomorphologic processes is a key component for the sustainable management of water resources in Vertisols. The contribution of shrinkage cracks to infiltration of runoff and sediments was studied during natural and simulated rainfall experiments in Vertisols of the semi-arid plains of northeastern Mexico during the summer of 1998. Surface runoff amounted to 10.7% of the total applied rainfall, but it increased from 2.3 t o 18.3% during the first and last applied rainfall. Soil cracks partially filled with transported sediments in surface runoff, but never sealed by swelling or by sedimentation during the sprinkling of 180 mm of rainfall applied in three installments during 1 wk. However, cracks observed in 1999 closed during natural rainfalls with a total depth of 450 mm, distributed in 10 storms during 3 mo. The development of soil cracks and their contribution to promote short-circuit flow are highly variable processes in time and space. Key Words: Dynamics of shrinkage cracks, irregular wetting fronts

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.154
Threshold uncertainty score0.987

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.201
Teacher spread0.195 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations24
Published2002
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Soil ScienceSame topicSoil and Unsaturated FlowFrench-language works237,207