<scp>d</scp>-Penicillamine-Induced Autoimmunity in the Brown Norway Rat: Role for Both T and Non-T Splenocytes in Adoptive Transfer of Tolerance
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The D-penicillamine autoimmune syndrome observed in Brown Norway (BN) rats is similar to an idiosyncratic reaction seen in some patients. We have previously shown that 2 weeks of low dose (5 mg/day) D-penicillamine pretreatment completely prevented all clinical signs of autoimmunity normally observed in 60-80% of rats treated with high dose (20 mg/day) D-penicillamine. We demonstrated that this tolerance is immune-mediated; tolerance to D-penicillamine is long lasting, we can adoptively transfer splenocytes from tolerant rats into slightly irradiated naive syngeneic recipients, and rats exposed to low dose D-penicillamine produce tolerogenic cytokines [Masson, M. J., and Uetrecht, J. P. (2004) Tolerance induced by low dose D-penicillamine in the brown norway rat model of drug-induced autoimmunity is immune-mediated. Chem. Res. Toxicol. 17, 82-94]. The aim of this study was to provide further understanding of the cells that are responsible for transferring tolerance and to assess the presence of regulatory T cells in the spleen of tolerant animals. We cotransferred T cells or splenocytes depleted of T cells from tolerant BN rats with splenocytes from naive BN rats into lightly irradiated syngeneic recipients. We found that neither tolerant splenocyte subpopulation could completely prevent clinical signs of autoimmunity. These results demonstrate that immune tolerance to D-penicillamine-induced autoimmunity may require both antigen presenting cells and T cells.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".