MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2008543057 · doi:10.3725/jjn.36.1

Attraction of the pinewood nematode to mycelium of some wood-decay fungi

2006· article· en· W2008543057 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Yasuharu Mamiya

Bibliographic record

VenueNematological Research (Japanese Journal of Nematology) · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicNematode management and characterization studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersDirectorate for Biological SciencesUniversity of TokyoSimon Fraser University
KeywordsMyceliumBursaphelenchus xylophilusLentinulaBiologyNematodeAttractionPleurotus ostreatusBotanyBotrytis cinereaFungusHorticultureMushroomEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Migration of the pinewood nematode, Bursaphelenchus xylophilus, to the mycelia of wood-decay fungi was investigated on water agar plates. A very strong ability to attract nematodes was shown by Pleurotus ostreatus, P. pulmonarius, P. eryngi, Lentinula edodes and Lampteromyces japonicus, all of which had been demonstrated to be nematophagous in previous studies. Other wood-decay fungi, Neolentinus lepideus, Trichaptum abietinum, Cryptoporus volvatus and Pholiota nameko, having less or no ability of killing nematodes, did not attract nematodes. Botrytis cinerea attracted nematodes although not as strongly as the nemtophagous wood-decay fungi. Based on the experimental results it could be concluded that nematophagous wood-decay fungi were attractive to the pinewood nematode.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.057
GPT teacher head0.314
Teacher spread0.257 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations15
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNematological Research (Japanese Journal of Nematology)Same topicNematode management and characterization studiesFrench-language works237,207