Conical Structures in Ice: Ride-Up, Radius and Results
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract As an ice sheet impinges on the surface of a cone, flexural failure takes place. That ice failure mode causes substantially lower forces than the case of compressive failure, which would take place if ice is to encounter a vertical structure. Previous work by the authors employed a numerical model of ice dynamics in order to predict ice failure patterns and forces on a conical structure. In an initial paper, simulations examined the role of the slope of the cone and the case of ice failure against inverted cones. That study indicated that the slope plays a role on ice loading. Later results, published at ATC 2014, then examined in more detail the roles of structure slope, friction on ice pile-ups and loading on a conical structure and compared the results with the analytical methodology presented in the ISO 19906 Arctic Offshore Structures standard. The present analysis continues to expand the work to examine the role of structure diameter on ice loading and pile-up height. Results are further compared to ISO 19906, with the objective of presenting concrete guidance for the current revision of that standard. Ice forces on upward-breaking cones as a function of structure slope, waterline diameter, ice thickness and ice-structure friction are presented. The results of the study are relevant for structures in ice, such as offshore drilling platforms, bridge piers and offshore wind turbine foundations.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".