Laparoscopic Antireflux Procedures in the Management of Gastroesophageal Reflux Following Esophageal Atresia Repair
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: The validity of open fundoplication after esophageal atresia (EA) repair is still disputed. The authors have retrospectively evaluated the results achieved in their centers using laparoscopic antireflux procedures (LARP) in children operated for EA at birth. METHODS: From 1998 to 2002, 350 children underwent LARP. Of these, 21 (6%) underwent EA repair at birth. Our study focused only on the management of these 21 patients; 5 of them (23.8%) were neurologically impaired children (NIC). All underwent LARP, 9 patients according to Nissen, 9 according to Thal, and 3 according to Toupet. The 5 NIC with feeding problems underwent concomitant g-tube placement during the same procedure. RESULTS: All the procedures were completed in laparoscopy, without intraoperative complications. The mean operative time was 65 minutes (range 45-140). We had no mortality in our series. Hospital stay varied from 2 to 9 days (median 3 days). At a maximum follow-up of 6 years, all patients were evaluated with a 24-hours pH-metry and barium swallow. The 16 neurologically normal children were free of symptoms at the last follow-up; five of them (31.2%) had mild dysphagia, which disappeared spontaneously within 3-6 months. One girl experienced an important episode of aspiration 2 years after the LARP, although there was no evidence of reflux at the follow-up examinations. As for the 5 NIC, one patient eats only through a g-tube, the other 4 undergo mixed feeding (g-tube and mouth); none have signs of GER, but two of them still present respiratory symptoms, and one has delayed gastric emptying. CONCLUSIONS: In our experience laparoscopic antireflux surgery is an appropriate treatment of GER in children operated for EA at birth, independently of the antireflux mechanism adopted; the 31.2% rate of short-term dysphagia presenting as residual respiratory symptoms may be due to a primary dysmotility of the esophagus consequent to the esophageal atresia.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".