Feeding specialization in <i>Herichthys minckleyi</i>: a trophically polymorphic fish
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Diet specialization in the trophically polymorphic cichlid fish Herichthys minckleyi was examined using gut contents. Individual H. minckleyi were categorized as having molariform, papilliform or undetermined pharyngeal jaws. The presence of enlarged flattened pharyngeal jaw teeth was used to categorize H. minckleyi as molariform, and the possession of only small pencil‐like pharyngeal teeth was used to classify fish as papilliform. Undetermined individuals (<50 mm standard length, L S ) were not assigned to one of the two larger morphotypes. Arthropods were found to be generally rare in H. minckleyi gut contents, but when present, they were most frequently recovered from undetermined individuals. The percentage of plant material consumed by undetermined H. minckleyi was not as great as papilliforms ingested on average, and snail crushing by undetermined H. minckleyi was not evident. A significantly greater mean percentage of plant detritus was recovered from papilliforms compared to molariforms. Snails were crushed by molariforms more frequently than by papilliforms. When only molariforms and papilliforms that had crushed snails were compared, a greater number of snails were crushed by molariforms. No relationship was found between molariform L S and the number of snails crushed, but greater molariform tooth number, adjusted for L S , was indicative of recent snail crushing. The maintenance of H. minckleyi pharyngeal jaw variation could be promoted by intraspecific diet differentiation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".