Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Induction of Apoptosis in the Testes of Goldfish (<i>Carassius auratus</i>)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Apoptosis, or programmed cell death, can occur via death receptor or mitochondrial pathways. Normal spermatogenesis in mammals involves apoptosis mediated, in part, by the death receptor fas and its ligand. The regulation of programmed cell death in the gonads has been shown to be dependent on a number of locally produced factors, including GnRH. Whereas the role of GnRH in the control of apoptosis and follicular atresia has been documented in the mammalian ovary, GnRH regulation of testicular apoptosis remains obscure. A previous study in our laboratory demonstrated the involvement of GnRH on the induction of DNA fragmentation in mature, perispawning testis. In this study, we tested the hypothesis that GnRH plays a differential regulatory role during male gamete maturation by studying the effect of GnRH on the induction of apoptosis during goldfish spermatogenesis. Treatment with GnRH resulted in DNA fragmentation only during late stages of spermatogenesis as assessed by oligonucleotide detection and terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase-mediated deoxyuridine triphosphate nick end labeling assays. The GnRH-induced apoptosis in the goldfish testis was found to be mediated by increased levels of fas and fas ligand-like proteins as well as elevated activity of caspase-3 (an executioner caspase) and -8 (a death receptor-activated caspase). The results suggest the involvement of the death receptor pathway in GnRH-induced apoptosis, providing support for the hypothesis that GnRH plays an important role in the control of spermatogenesis in the goldfish testis.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".