Mapping lichen changes in the summer range of the George River Caribou Herd (Québec-Labrador, Canada) using Landsat imagery (1976-1998)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Habitat studies are essential in order to understand the dynamics of migratory caribou herds and to better define management strategies. In this paper, multi-date Landsat images are used to map lichen in the summer range of the George River Caribou Herd (GRCH), Québec-Labrador (Canada), over the period from 1976 to 1998. Multi-Spectral Scanner scenes from the seventies and Thematic Mapper scenes from the eighties and nineties were radiometrically normalized and processed using spectral mixture analysis to produce lichen fraction maps and lichen change maps. Field sites, surveyed during summer campaigns in 2000 and 2001, are used to validate the lichen maps. Results show a good agreement between field data and the lichen results obtained from image analysis. Maps are then interpreted in the context of previous caribou dynamics and habitat studies conducted in the study area over the last three decades. The remote-sensing results confirm the habitat degradation and herd distribution patterns described by other investigators. The period between 1976-1979 and 1985-1986 is characterized by a localized decrease in lichen cover in the southern part of the study area, whereas from 1985-1986 to 1998 the decrease in lichen cover extends northward and westward. This period coincides with the widest extent of the GRCH summer range and activity. The approach presented in this paper provides a valuable means for better understanding the spatio-temporal relation between herd dynamics and distribution, as well as habitat use. Satellite remote sensing imagery is a useful data source, providing timely information over vast and remote territories where caribou populations cannot be surveyed and managed on a frequent basis.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".