MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2008774023 · doi:10.1021/bi801008e

Alternative Sites for Proton Entry from the Cytoplasm to the Quinone Binding Site in <i>Escherichia coli</i> Succinate Dehydrogenase

2008· article· en· W2008774023 on OpenAlexaff
Victor W. T. Cheng, Antonia Johnson, Richard A. Rothery, Joël H. Weiner

Bibliographic record

VenueBiochemistry · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicPhotosynthetic Processes and Mechanisms
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEscherichia coliCytoplasmSuccinate dehydrogenaseChemistryQuinoneBinding siteBiochemistryProtonEnzymePhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Escherichia coli succinate dehydrogenase (Sdh) belongs to the highly conserved complex II family of enzymes that reduce ubiquinone. These enzymes do not generate a protonmotive force during catalysis and are electroneutral. Because of its electroneutrality, the quinone reduction reaction must consume cytoplasmic protons which are released stoichiometrically during succinate oxidation. The X-ray crystal structure of E. coli Sdh shows that residues SdhB (G227), SdhC (D95), and SdhC (E101) are located at or near the entrance of a water channel that has been proposed to function as a proton wire connecting the cytoplasm to the quinone binding site. However, the pig and chicken Sdh enzymes show an alternative entrance to the water channel via the conserved SdhD (Q78) residue. In this study, site-directed mutants of these four residues were created and characterized by in vivo growth assays, in vitro activity assays, and electron paramagnetic resonance spectroscopy. We show that the observed water channel in the E. coli Sdh structure is the functional proton wire in vivo, while in vitro results indicate an alternative entrance for protons. In silico examination of the E. coli Sdh reveals a possible H-bonding network leading from the cytoplasm to the quinone binding site that involves SdhD (D15). On the basis of these results we propose an alternative proton pathway in E. coli Sdh that might be functional only in vitro.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.238
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBiochemistrySame topicPhotosynthetic Processes and MechanismsFrench-language works237,207