MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2008912215 · doi:10.1139/o09-061

Beyond structure, to survival: activation of Stat3 by cadherin engagement

2009· review· en· W2008912215 on OpenAlexafffundvenue
Leda Raptis, Rozanne Arulanandam, Adina Vultur, Mulu Geletu, S. Chevalier, Hélène Feracci

Bibliographic record

VenueBiochemistry and Cell Biology · 2009
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCytokine Signaling Pathways and Interactions
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsSTAT3Cell biologySTAT proteinCell adhesionCell growthCellCDC42BiologyIntracellularCadherinExtracellularSignal transductionChemistryBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cells in normal tissues or in tumors have extensive opportunities for adhesion to their neighbors and the importance of cell to cell contact in the study of fundamental cellular processes is beginning to emerge. In this review, we discuss recent evidence of dramatic changes in the activity of an important signal transducer found to be profoundly affected by cell to cell adhesion, the signal transducer and activator of transcription-3 (Stat3). Direct cadherin engagement, growth of cells to postconfluence, or formation of multicellular aggregates were found to induce a striking increase in the levels of Stat3 activity, Rac1/Cdc42, and members of the IL6 receptor family in different settings. This activation was specific to Stat3, in that the levels of the extracellular signal regulated kinase (Erk1/2), a signal transducer often coordinately activated with Stat3 by a number of growth factors or oncogenes, remained unaffected by cell density. Density-dependent Stat3 activation may play a key role in survival, and could contribute to the establishment of cell polarity. It is clear that at any given time the total Stat3 activity levels in a cell are the sum of the effects of cell to cell adhesion plus the conventional Stat3 activating factors present.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.707
Threshold uncertainty score0.763

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.330
Teacher spread0.295 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations34
Published2009
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBiochemistry and Cell BiologySame topicCytokine Signaling Pathways and InteractionsFrench-language works237,207