MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2008972394 · doi:10.1017/s0317167100016681

Peace Sign in Calcified Idiopathic Hypertrophic Pachymeningitis

2014· article· en· W2008972394 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Josef G. Heckmann, Gerhard Oberst

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Neurological Sciences / Journal Canadien des Sciences Neurologiques · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicNeurosurgical Procedures and Complications
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTentoriumFalx cerebriCalcificationTentorium cerebelliMedicineFluid-attenuated inversion recoveryRadiologyMagnetic resonance imagingAnatomyNuclear medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The peace sign (Figure 1a) was originally designed in 1958 by Gerald Holtom for the British nuclear disarmament movement. It derived from the semaphore alphabet “N” and “D” representing ‘nuclear’ and ‘disarmament’. We recently cared for an 81-year-old woman with isolated complex-partial seizures who responded well to a medical treatment with carbamazepine. Coronar cranial computed tomography (CCT) (Figure 1b) showed a marked calcification of the tentorium, the posterior supratentorial falx, and the cerebellar falx mimicking a peace sign. Magnet resonance tomography (MRT) showed on a fluid attenuation inversion recovery (FLAIR) sequence (Figure 1c) a diminished signal consistent with calcification. An MRT five years earlier showed marked contrast enhancement of the tentorium and falx and adjacent dura (Figure 1d) on a T1- weighted image. The large sinus had been open. At this time diagnosis of probable idiopathic hypertrophic pachymeningitis was made as the realized evaluation failed to reveal a cause. A lumbar puncture, however, was not performed. As her clinical signs and symptoms resolved spontaneously no specific therapy was initiated. It is suggested that during time the inflammed dura healed by calcification.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.260
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.003
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.275
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Neurological Sciences / Journal Canadien des Sciences NeurologiquesSame topicNeurosurgical Procedures and ComplicationsFrench-language works237,207