Probing Inhibitory Effects of <i>Antrodia camphorata</i> Isolates Using Insect Cell-Based Impedance Spectroscopy: Inhibition vs Chemical Structure
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A continuous online technique based on electric cell-substrate impedance sensing (ECIS) was used for probing inhibitory effects on Spodoptera frugiperda Sf9 insect cells exposed to structurally similar compounds isolated and purified from the fruiting bodies of the fungus Antrodia camphorata. Such chemicals consisted of three ergostane-related steroids and five lanosta-related triterpenes, which are known for their diverse properties and use in the formulation of nutraceuticals and functional foods. The half-inhibition concentration (ECIS(50)), the level at which 50% inhibition of the resistance response was obtained, was determined from the response function to establish inhibitory effects of the different isolates. A slight change in their chemical structures resulted in significant effects on inhibition as probed by impedance spectroscopy. The ergostane-related steroids were mostly inhibitory, but replacing their ketone groups with hydrogen or hydroxyl groups significantly reduced the inhibition. Similarly, the addition of methyl or carboxymethyl groups also lowered the inhibition. Removal of the double bond conjugation within the rings (sulfurenic acid) of the isolate drastically reduced the inhibition.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it