MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2009084017 · doi:10.1055/s-2005-870268

Gastric Intestinal Vascular Ectasia Syndrome: Findings on Capsule Endoscopy

2005· article· en· W2009084017 on OpenAlex
Shou‐jiang Tang, Gabor Kandel, Norman E. Marcon, Paul Kortan

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueEndoscopy · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGastrointestinal Bleeding Diagnosis and Treatment
Canadian institutionsSt. Michael's Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineEctasiaCapsule endoscopyGastric antral vascular ectasiaDuodenumRectumLamina propriaGastrointestinal tractGastroenterologyMelenaColonoscopyPathologicalCecumHyperplasiaPathologyInternal medicineEndoscopyColorectal cancerArgon plasma coagulationCancerEpithelium

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Gastric antral vascular ectasia (GAVE) syndrome has been recognized as an important cause of gastrointestinal hemorrhage [1] [2]. Histopathologically, GAVE is characterized by superficial fibromuscular hyperplasia of the gastric antral mucosa, with capillary ectasia and microvascular thrombosis in the lamina propria. Although it is helpful to make a pathological diagnosis, the most reliable means of diagnosing GAVE and other areas of angioectasia in the gastrointestinal tract is by direct endoscopic visualization [2]. Since GAVE was first described, there have been several reports of patients with similar endoscopic findings in other regions of the gastrointestinal tract, including the cardia [3], duodenum [4], colon [5] [6], and rectum [7]. Terms such as “watermelon cecum”, “watermelon colon”, and “watermelon rectum” have been coined to describe such lesions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.130
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.269
Teacher spread0.254 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it