MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2009152606 · doi:10.1002/pen.10865

Microstructural effects on hot drawing syndiotactic styrene P‐methyl styrene copolymer

2001· article· en· W2009152606 on OpenAlexafffund
Rong Jiang Yan, A. Ajji, D. M. Shinozaki

Bibliographic record

VenuePolymer Engineering and Science · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicPolymer crystallization and properties
Canadian institutionsWestern University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsMaterials scienceDifferential scanning calorimetryCopolymerTacticityGlass transitionAmorphous solidStyreneEnthalpy of fusionMelting pointMelting temperatureFusionComposite materialPolymer chemistryPolymerCrystallographyThermodynamicsPolymerization

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Crystalline syndiotactic styrene/p‐methyl styrene copolymer (SPMS) has been oriented by tensile drawing at various temperatures between the glass transition and crystalline melting point. The microstructural changes resulting from drawing have been studied using differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) and wide angle X‐ray diffraction (WAXD). WIth increasing draw temperature, both melting temperature and crystalline dimensions of the oriented samples increase. The heat of fusion increases with increasing draw temperature up to ∼200°C. It also increases with draw ratio and draw rate, while the crystalline width increases only with draw ratio. THe amorphous fraction shows a clear glass transition, the temperature of which (T g ) increases with draw ratio. However, T g decreases somewhat with increasing draw temperature. This is interpreted in terms of the stretching of the randomly coiled amorphous phase molecules.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.853

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.222
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2001
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePolymer Engineering and ScienceSame topicPolymer crystallization and propertiesFrench-language works237,207