MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2009156994 · doi:10.1191/1352458502ms810oa

Cytokine production in T lymphocytemicroglia interaction is attenuated by glatiramer acetate: a mechanism for therapeutic efficacy in multiple sclerosis

2002· article· en· W2009156994 on OpenAlexaff
Sophie Chabot, FP Yong, DM Le, L Metz, Timothy Myles, V. Wee Yong

Bibliographic record

VenueMultiple Sclerosis Journal · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicNeuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
FundersTeva Pharmaceutical Industries
KeywordsGlatiramer acetateMicrogliaMultiple sclerosisCytokineMedicineImmunologyPharmacologyInflammation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The efficacy of glatiramer acetate in multiple sclerosis (MS) is thought to involve the production of Th2 regulatory lymphocytes that secrete anti-inflammatory cytokines; however, other mechanisms cannot be excluded Given that activated T lymphocytes infiltrate into the CNS and become in dose proximity to microglia, we evaluated whether glatiramer acetate affects the potential interaction between T cells and microglia. We report that the co-culture of activated T lymphocytes with microglia led to the induction of several cytokines, and that these were reduced by glatiramer acetate treatment Morphological transformation of bipolar/ramified microglia into an activated ameboid form was attenuated by glatiramer acetate. These results reveal a novel mechanism for glatiramer acetate: the impairment of activated T cells to effectively interact with microglia to produce cytokines. The net result of a non-inflammatory milieu within the CNS, in spite of T cell infiltration, may help account for the amelioration of disease activity in MS patients on glatiramer acetate therapy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.123
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.170
GPT teacher head0.275
Teacher spread0.104 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations40
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMultiple Sclerosis JournalSame topicNeuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration MechanismsFrench-language works237,207