Reversal of Focal Misery Perfusion after Intracranial Angioplasty: Case Report
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE AND IMPORTANCE: The presence of reduced blood flow and increased oxygen extraction fraction (OEF) (misery perfusion) in the hemisphere distal to an occluded carotid artery is a proven risk factor for subsequent stroke. Whether angioplasty of intracranial stenosis is sufficient to reverse this condition has not been documented. CLINICAL PRESENTATION: A 67-year-old man exhibited progressive right hemispheric ischemic symptoms despite maximal antiplatelet and antithrombotic therapy. Angiography demonstrated focal 80% stenosis of the supraclinoid segment of the ipsilateral internal carotid artery. TECHNIQUE: 15O positron emission tomographic measurements of cerebral blood flow and OEF were made before and after transfemoral percutaneous angioplasty. OEF values measured before angioplasty were elevated in the middle cerebral artery distal to the stenosis. Angioplasty reduced the degree of luminal stenosis to 40% (linear diameter). OEF values measured 36 hours after angioplasty were normal. CONCLUSION: Angioplasty of intracranial stenosis can restore normal cerebral blood flow and oxygen extraction, despite mild residual stenosis after the procedure. Hemodynamic measurements may be useful for the identification of patients with the greatest potential to benefit from angioplasty.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".