MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2009242780 · doi:10.2320/matertrans.47.1058

Solid State Synthesis of Ternary Thermoelectric Magnesium Alloy, Mg<SUB>2</SUB>Si<SUB>1−<I>x</I></SUB>Sn<I><SUB>x</SUB></I>

2006· article· en· W2009242780 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueMATERIALS TRANSACTIONS · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicMXene and MAX Phase Materials
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMaterials scienceIntermetallicTernary operationThermoelectric effectTinSeebeck coefficientAlloyMagnesiumSolid solutionThermoelectric materialsReactivity (psychology)MetallurgyAnalytical Chemistry (journal)Chemical engineeringThermal conductivityComposite materialThermodynamicsChemistryOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Profound understanding and survey of magnesium base intermetallic compounds is hindered by various difficulties in their processing and fabrication. Solid-state synthesis via the bulk mechanical alloying (BMA) is free from contaminations and segregation through high reactivity of elemental constituents against crucibles or vials. Magnesium–tin system is employed to demonstrate the solid-state reactivity to Mg2Sn from the elemental powder mixture. This process is characterized by the gradual solid-state reaction to Mg2Sn with processing time. Since the blended mixture of magnesium and tin with the initial molar ratio of Mg66.7%Sn33.3%, is repeatedly strained via BMA in the controlled conditions, the solid-state reaction advances monotonically with refinement of interparticle distance between magnesium and tin. Ternary semi-conductive compounds, Mg2Si1−xSnx for 0≤x≤1, are also synthesized by this process. Thermoelectric properties of this ternary alloy are investigated to discuss the effect of tin content on the band-gap, the thermal conductivity, the Seebeck coefficient and the figure-of-merit. In addition, these data are compared to the previously reported results by using melt and solidified samples in order to describe the common features in the solid-solution type thermoelectric compounds. Furthermore, p–n transition behavior is also reported in this ternary alloy system.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.010
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Open science, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.082
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0100.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0090.009
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0110.004
Bibliometrics0.0050.006
Science and technology studies0.0050.004
Scholarly communication0.0050.006
Open science0.0080.001
Research integrity0.0040.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0160.008

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.236
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it