Lack of evidence of monomer/misfolded superoxide dismutase‐1 in sporadic amyotrophic lateral sclerosis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: In familial amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (fALS) harboring superoxide dismutase (SOD1) mutations (fALS1), SOD1 toxicity has been linked to its propensity to misfold and aggregate. It has recently been proposed that misfolded SOD1 may be causative of all types of ALS, including sporadic cases (sALS). In the present study, we have used a specific antibody to test for the presence of monomer/misfolded SOD1 in sALS. METHODS: Sections from lumbar spinal cords of 5 fALS1 cases, 13 sALS cases, and 1 non-SOD1 fALS case were labeled immunocytochemically using SOD1-exposed-dimer-interface (SEDI) antibody, which we have previously validated as being specific for pathological monomer/misfolded forms of SOD1. RESULTS: Monomer/misfolded SOD1 was detected with SEDI antibody in all 5 of the fALS1 cases, localizing predominantly to hyaline conglomerate inclusions, a specific pathological feature of fALS1. In contrast, monomer/misfolded SOD1 was not detected in any of the 13 sALS cases or in the non-SOD1 fALS cases. These results were confirmed by immunoprecipitation. INTERPRETATION: Although SEDI antibody does not necessarily label all misfolded forms of SOD1, these findings show a distinct difference between fALS1 and sALS, and do not support that monomer/misfolded SOD1 is a common disease entity linking all types of ALS. This is important to our understanding of ALS disease pathogenesis and to considerations of the applicability of using therapeutics that target misfolded SOD1 to non-SOD1-related cases. Ann Neurol 2009;66:75-80.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".