Propriétés structurales des jonctions de nanotubes de carbone
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The junction between two different nanotubes can be realized by the simple insertion of a pentagon-heptagon pair defect while preserving the triple coordination of each C atom. This insertion bends the structure to an angle depending on the distance between the pentagonand heptagon. The atomic structure of several of these junctions was optimized with the help of empirical potentials, the nanotubes on both sides of the junctions being considered as infinitely long. Local densities of σ + π electronic states were evaluated in the interfacial regions from a tight-binding Hamiltonian. From there, the electronic energy of these junctions was calculated and compared with that of the isolated nanotubes. It was established that the energy associated with the pentagon-heptagone pair in a graphitic tubule is of the order of 6 eV. An automatic generation algorithm for connecting any two tubules was developed. By restricting the Hamiltonian to the sole π orbitals, this algorithm made it feasible to study the energetics of the pentagon-heptagon defect in a systematical way.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.008 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".