Evoked pain in the motor endplate region of the brachial biceps muscle: An experimental study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Spontaneous electrical activity, interpreted as motor endplate activity, has been reported at muscle trigger points. This study examined whether the motor endplate region, identified by electromyography, is more sensitive to noxious stimuli than other muscle sites. We induced pain in the brachial biceps muscles of 21 healthy subjects by injecting capsaicin (30 microg/0.1 ml) and NaCl (5%/0.2 ml) in the motor endplate region and at electrically silent muscle sites. Needle and evoked pain were measured by a visual analogue scale (VAS) (0-10) and the short form of the McGill Pain Questionnaire. The needle pain in the motor endplate region differed both in intensity and quality from that at other sites. The maximal pain after NaCl 5% was higher, and the VAS area-under-the-curve for NaCl 5% and capsaicin were larger, in the motor endplate region than in other sites. A higher density of muscle nociceptors in the vicinity of the motor endplate region may account for the observed differences in pain. These findings may have clinical implications for the treatment of musculoskeletal pain conditions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".