Evoked pain in the motor endplate region of the brachial biceps muscle: An experimental study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Spontaneous electrical activity, interpreted as motor endplate activity, has been reported at muscle trigger points. This study examined whether the motor endplate region, identified by electromyography, is more sensitive to noxious stimuli than other muscle sites. We induced pain in the brachial biceps muscles of 21 healthy subjects by injecting capsaicin (30 microg/0.1 ml) and NaCl (5%/0.2 ml) in the motor endplate region and at electrically silent muscle sites. Needle and evoked pain were measured by a visual analogue scale (VAS) (0-10) and the short form of the McGill Pain Questionnaire. The needle pain in the motor endplate region differed both in intensity and quality from that at other sites. The maximal pain after NaCl 5% was higher, and the VAS area-under-the-curve for NaCl 5% and capsaicin were larger, in the motor endplate region than in other sites. A higher density of muscle nociceptors in the vicinity of the motor endplate region may account for the observed differences in pain. These findings may have clinical implications for the treatment of musculoskeletal pain conditions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".