Electron density shape analysis of a family of through-space and through-bond interactions
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A family of styrene derivatives has been used to study the effects of through-space and through-bond interactions on the local and global shapes of electron densities of complete molecules and a set of substituents on their central rings. Shape analysis methods which have been used extensively in the past for the study of molecular property-molecular shape correlations have shown that in these molecules a complementary role is played by the through-space and through-bond interactions. For each specific example, the dominance of either one of the two interactions can be identified and interpreted in terms of local shapes and the typical reactivities of the various substituents. Three levels of quantum chemical computational methods have been applied for these structures, including the B3LYP/cc-pVTZ level of density functional methodology, and the essential conclusions are the same for all three levels. The general approach is suggested as a tool for the identification of specific interaction types which are able to modify molecular electron densities. By separately influencing the through-space and through-bond components using polar groups and groups capable of conjugation, some fine-tuning of the overall effects becomes possible. The method described may contribute to an improved understanding and control of molecular properties involving complex interactions with a possible role in the emerging field of molecular design.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".