Amino‐acid substitution in the disordered loop of blood group B‐glycosyltransferase enzyme causes weak B phenotype
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Few studies have investigated the reaction kinetics and interactions with nucleotide donor and acceptor substrates of mutant human ABO glycosyltransferases. Previous work identified a B(w) allele featuring a 556G>A polymorphism giving rise to a weak B phenotype. This polymorphism is predicted to cause a M186V amino-acid mutation within a highly conserved series of 16 amino acids present both in both blood group A- and blood group B-synthesizing enzymes. These residues are known as the disordered loop because their location cannot be determined in the crystal structure of the enzyme. Another patient has been identified with a 556G>A B(w) allele and the kinetics of the resulting mutant glycosyltransferase were studied. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Serologic testing with murine and human reagents, amplification of the coding regions of exons 6 and 7, and DNA sequencing were performed with standard protocols. Enzyme kinetic studies utilized a model of human GTB M186V expressed in Escherichia coli with radiolabeled UDP-galactose and UDP-N-acetylgalactosamine as donor substrates and synthetic H-disaccharide as acceptor following standard protocols. RESULTS: The patient's red blood cells demonstrated a weak, but not mixed-field, B phenotype. Kinetic studies on the mutant enzyme revealed diminished activity (k(cat) = 0.15 per sec with UDP-galactose compared to 5.1 per sec for wild-type GTB) and elevated K(m) values for all substrates. CONCLUSION: This enzyme with a mutation in the disordered loop produces weak B antigen expression because of greatly decreased enzyme activity and reduced affinity for B-donor and acceptor substances.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".