MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2009425806 · doi:10.1074/jbc.m705424200

Opposing Roles of Syndecan-1 and Syndecan-2 in Polyethyleneimine-mediated Gene Delivery

2008· article· en· W2009425806 on OpenAlexaff
Sébastien Paris, Alina Burlacu, Yves Durocher

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Biological Chemistry · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicRNA Interference and Gene Delivery
Canadian institutionsNational Research Council CanadaBiotechnology Research Institute
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSyndecan 1Gene deliveryCell biologyChemistryGeneBiologyGenetic enhancementBiochemistryCell

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Polyethyleneimines (PEIs) are efficient non-viral vectors for gene transfer. Heparan sulfate proteoglycans have been proposed to be the cell-surface receptors for PEI.DNA complexes (polyplexes). Here, we investigated if syndecan-1 (SDC1) and syndecan-2 (SDC2) are involved in PEI-mediated transfection. Following addition of polyplexes to HEK293 cells, green fluorescent protein-tagged SDCs rapidly formed clusters with PEI that were dependent of lipid raft integrity. However, although SDC1 overexpression slightly enhanced PEI-mediated gene expression, SDC2 dramatically inhibited it. Confocal microscopy analysis showed that SDC1.polyplex endocytosis occurred within minutes after addition of polyplexes, whereas SDC2.polyplex endocytosis took hours. Expression of SDC1 cytoplasmic deletion mutants revealed that the SDC1 cytoplasmic tail is required for gene expression, but not for clustering or endocytosis, whereas overexpression of SDC1/SDC2 chimeras showed that the SDC2 ectodomain is responsible for the inhibitory effect on gene transfer. This study provides evidence that SDCs may have opposing effects on PEI-mediated transfection.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.000
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.241
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations64
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Biological ChemistrySame topicRNA Interference and Gene DeliveryFrench-language works237,207