MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2009452113 · doi:10.3899/jrheum.100187

Methotrexate for Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Guide from Canada

2010· letter· en· W2009452113 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Suzanne Verstappen, Kimme L Hyrich

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Rheumatology · 2010
Typeletter
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRheumatoid Arthritis Research and Therapies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineDiscontinuationMethotrexateRheumatoid arthritisMedical prescriptionInternal medicineAntifolateIntensive care medicineAntimetabolitePharmacology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Methotrexate (MTX) has been on the market for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) for some decades. The first, larger studies showing efficacy of MTX treatment in patients with RA were published in 19851,2. In 1986 the US Food and Drug Administration approved the drug for the treatment of RA, starting MTX therapy at an initial test dose of 2.5 mg to establish hematologic tolerance to a maximum of 20 mg/week3. Since then, MTX has increasingly been prescribed for patients with RA and is now considered by many to be the disease-modifying drug (DMARD) of first choice for most patients with RA4. To develop practical recommendations for the use of MTX in rheumatic diseases, the 3E initiative (Evidence, Expertise, Exchange) set up an international consensus meeting 2007–2008. The aim of this meeting was to define recommendations for MTX use in daily practice according to evidence-based medicine, by integrating systematically generated evidence from the literature with expert opinion. During this meeting 10 questions were addressed by rheumatologists from 17 countries in Europe and North and South America. Published recommendations cover starting dose and escalation dose of MTX, prescription of at least 5 mg folic acid with MTX therapy, adjustment or discontinuation of MTX therapy in case of persistent elevated liver enzyme levels, and discontinuation of MTX prior to planned pregnancy in men and women5. Next to these internationally chosen recommendations, the Canadian rheumatologists addressed 5 additional questions on drug interaction, monitoring, predictors of response, patients’ preference, and management of nuisance side effects; their recommendations are reported in this issue of The Journal 6. ### Recommendation 1 The majority of the drugs including nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAID) may be used safely in combination with MTX in rheumatic diseases. Trimethoprim and sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMX) … Address correspondence to Dr. Verstappen; E-mail: suzanne.verstappen{at}manchester.ac.uk

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.511
Threshold uncertainty score0.972

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0040.005
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0030.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0720.066

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.272
Teacher spread0.258 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2010
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Rheumatology→Same topicRheumatoid Arthritis Research and Therapies→French-language works237,207→