Association Between Toll-like Receptor 4 Gene Polymorphism and Biopsy-proven Giant Cell Arteritis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Dendritic cells localized at the adventitia-media border of the normal medium-sized arteries play a pivotal role in the initiation of giant cell arteritis (GCA). These cells express a singular surface receptor profile, including a series of Toll-like receptors (TLR). Ligands of TLR-4 promote activation and differentiation of adventitial dendritic cells and are directly implicated in the pathogenesis of GCA. We aimed to assess the potential implication of the TLR4-(+896 A/G) gene polymorphism in the susceptibility to GCA. METHODS: A total of 210 patients diagnosed with biopsy-proven GCA and 678 matched controls were included in our study. DNA from patients and controls was obtained from peripheral blood. Samples were genotyped for the TLR4-(+896 A/G) (rs4986790) gene polymorphism by polymerase chain reaction, using a predesigned TaqMan allele discrimination assay. RESULTS: The TLR4 +896 G allele was significantly increased in biopsy-proven GCA patients compared to controls [p = 0.01; odds ratio (OR) 1.65; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.08-2.52]. The increase was due to a significantly increased frequency of heterozygosity for the TLR4 -896 A/G genotype in the group of patients with biopsy-proven GCA compared to controls (TLR4 -896 A/G heterozygous in patients with GCA 18.1% compared to 11.4% in controls: p = 0.01; OR 1.72; 95% CI 1.10-2.69). However, no significant differences were observed when patients with GCA were stratified according to the presence of specific clinical features of the disease. CONCLUSION: Our results show for the first time an association of TLR4-(+896 A/G) gene polymorphism with susceptibility to biopsy-proven GCA.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".