Work in progress: Indirect passage from Europe Transmigration via the UK, 1836–1914
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Between 1836 and 1914, over thirty million European immigrants entered the United States of America. 1 Millions of others arrived in Canada, South Africa, Australia, New Zealand and Argentina.They left in search of freedom and opportunity of a degree not found in their native Europe.The Europe they left behind was suffering from the effects of rapid urbanisation, agrarian depression and population increase.Life was difficult enough without the extremes of harvest failure or religious persecution, factors that encouraged would-be migrants into taking the decision to migrate to the other side of the world -when most had never ventured beyond their provincial borders.Theodore Blegen, Irving Howe and Philip Taylor have all described those areas within America in which these European immigrants eventually settled. 2 Charlotte Erickson and William Jones have studied the millions of British emigrants who left Britain during this period. 3Others, such as Thomas Appleton, Francis Hyde, Laurence Dunn, and Wilton Oldham, have highlighted the role played by powerful British shipping lines such as Allan, Cunard, Union and Castle, and White Star, in the movement of millions of migrants across the Atlantic and to the southern hemisphere. 4 The existing historiographical works provide a detailed explanation of how the majority of European immigrants arrived in New York, Philadelphia, Boston, Quebec, Cape Town, Sydney, Buenos Aires and Auckland and the patterns that emerge through the analysis of their journey to the 'New World'.The purpose of this paper, and my Ph.D., is to examine those European migrants who made the decision to travel to the US and further afield indirectly via the UK.Such indirect migration represented a sizeable portion of the total number leaving Europe, particularly of those leaving the northern European countries of Finland, Germany, Norway, Poland, Russia and Sweden.Though 30 million European immigrants entered the US between 1836 and 1914, up to five million transmigrants, or 20 per cent of the total number of immigrants, passed through the UK.The migrants entered the UK via the eastern ports of Harwich, Hull, Grimsby, Leith, London, Newcastle and West Hartlepool.From these ports of arrival the transmigrants were then transported by train to the ports of Glasgow, Liverpool, London and Southampton, from where they could embark on the next stage in their journey.Though London served as the main port of entry for the millions of European immigrants entering the UK, it was the Humber ports of Hull and Grimsby that handled the majority of the transmigrants travelling via the UK -because the journey from the Humber to Liverpool was the shortest route in terms of time and distance to travel across the country.Of the five million European migrants who did arrive in the country between 1836 and 1914, over three million (or sixty per cent), did so via the Humber ports of Hull and Grimsby. 1
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.006 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".