A study of critical state on an unsaturated silty soil
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Critical state models for unsaturated soils have been proposed in recent years; however, the proposed models have been based on limited experimental data. Compacted specimens have generally been used for research, and the complications of soil fabric resulting from the compaction procedures have brought difficulties into the interpretation of fundamental soil behavior. There is a need to undertake further laboratory research studies on unsaturated soils, particularly to obtain a fundamental understanding of the shear strength and critical state of unsaturated soils by testing soil specimens with simple soil structures. Suction-controlled triaxial drained shear tests on an unsaturated silt were carried out as part of this research program. Specimens were prepared by gradually consolidating the initially slurried soil. The resulting specimens had a relatively simple soil fabric and stress history. The results showed that applying suction to an initially saturated specimen has a similar influence on the stressstrain behavior and critical state characteristics as does increasing its density by applying a higher confining pressure. The critical state lines for the unsaturated soil corresponding to different soil suctions are parallel to those for the saturated soil on the (q : p' ' ), (v : p' ' ), and (v w : p' ' ) planes.Key words: critical state, shear strength, unsaturated soils, volume change, triaxial testing.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".