Class I and class II ganglion cells of rabbit retina: A structural basis for X and Y (brisk) cells
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Morphological studies of rabbit retina have identified ganglion cells resembling "alpha" cells but none resembling cat "beta" cells. Four distinct types of class I cell, similar to alpha cells, were identified, each narrowly stratified and differing from the other three principally in the level of dendritic branching. These four levels of dendritic branching flank the two starburst/cholinergic amacrine cell substrata that mark the middle of sublaminae a and b. Compared with the other three, class Ia2 cells are the largest in cell body and dendritic field size, are sometimes homotypically dye coupled, and have slightly broader dendritic stratification. Class Ia2 and the slightly smaller class Ib2 cells form a paramorphic pair. Compared with class I cells, class II cells have smaller dendritic fields; a greater tendency to "tufted" dendritic branching, as shown in the companion paper; branching at one of three levels of the IPL; and similarly narrow stratification. Class IIa and class Ia1 cells branch at the same level, as do class IIb1 and class Ib1 cells. Class IIb2 cells branch slightly nearer the ganglion cell layer than class Ib2 cells and costratify with "blue-ON" cone bipolar cells. The class IIa and IIb2 cells form a paramorphic pair, whereas class IIb1 cells appear to be unpaired. The four types of class I cell probably correspond to ON- and OFF-center brisk-transient, fast-movement and slow-movement cells, whereas the three types of class II cell probably correspond to ON- and OFF-center brisk-sustained and color-coded ON-center X cells.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".