The Effect of Cerebrospinal Fluid on the Biomechanics of Spinal Cord
Bibliographic record
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN: A biomechanical study using ex vivo bovine spinal cord and dura, and a synthetic surrogate spinal cord with bovine dura. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effect of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) on spinal cord deformation characteristics and to evaluate the biofidelity of a new surrogate spinal cord using an ex vivo bovine model of the burst fracture process. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Spinal cord injury is associated with significant personal, economic and social costs. The role of CSF during the injury event and its effect on the spinal cord deformation and neurologic injury is not well understood. Such knowledge could inform preventative strategies and clinical interventions and aid the development and validation of experimental and computational models. METHODS: The transverse impact of a propelled bone fragment analogue with bovine and surrogate cord models was recorded with high speed video and the images analyzed to determine deformation trajectories. Each cord specimen was tested in 3 states: with dura and CSF, with dura only, and without dura. The effect of these states on deformation magnitude, duration, and energy loss parameters was assessed. RESULTS.: The estimated spinal cord deformation was significantly reduced, although not eliminated, in the presence of CSF when compared to the bare state. The duration of deformation was generally increased in the presence of CSF, though this difference was not statistically significant. This may indicate a reduction in the cord-fragment interaction force for a given impulse. The dura was found to have no significant effect on deformation parameters for the bovine spinal cord. The deformation of the surrogate cord gave similar trends for the different states in comparison to the bovine cord, but was significantly less than the bovine spinal cord for all conditions. CONCLUSION: The results indicate that the protective mechanism of CSF may not eliminate cord deformationunder the high energy transverse impact characteristic of a burst fracture. However, CSF may contribute to a lessening of cord deformation and applied force.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".