MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2009605994 · doi:10.1071/rdv20n1ab224

224 A COMPARATIVE STUDY BETWEEN WOOD AND PLAINS BISON

2007· article· en· W2009605994 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Carl Lessard, J. Danielson, J. Thundatil, Murray R. Woodbury, Robert McCorkell

Bibliographic record

VenueReproduction Fertility and Development · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSperm and Testicular Function
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBison bisonExtenderSemenBiologyReproductive biologySemen cryopreservationEndangered speciesSpermZoologyAnimal scienceSperm motilityEcologyFisheryBotanyAnatomyHabitatChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In Canada, brucellosis and tuberculosis threaten an estimated 4500 wood bison ( Bison bison athabascae ), a species considered at risk by the Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife In Canada (COSEWIC). To help rescue this species, our Wood Bison Reproductive Research group proposes to employ advanced reproductive technologies. Unfortunately, little is known about the reproductive physiology of the wood bison, which hinders the application of these reproductive technologies. In order to modify advanced reproductive techniques developed in cattle for use in wood bison, the large amounts of semen, embryos, and oocytes from wood bison required are not available. The purpose of this study was to compare semen collected from the more abundant and closely related plains bison ( Bison bison bison ) with that of wood bison. Semen from 3 wood and 4 plains bison were collected by electro-ejaculation during the summer of 2007. Andrological parameters of morphology and motility were recorded on fresh semen, extended semen, and post-thawed semen samples. A Student's t -test was used to compare the results of these two groups. Semen was cryopreserved using two commercially available cryopreservation media (Andromed and Triladyl, Minitube Canada, Ingersoll, Ontario, Canada). Sperm morphology and motility were not different between electro-ejaculated samples from plains and wood bison ( P > 0.05). Also, no difference was found in the survival rate of sperm from the electro-ejaculated samples between plains and wood bison after freezing and then thawing using an egg-yolk based extender (Triladyl) or an extender containing no products of animal origin (Andromed). A difference between cryopreservation media was found; post-thaw motility of Triladyl-treated sperm was higher (29%) than that of the Andromed-treated sperm (12%). Due to lack of previous success with preserving electro-ejaculated semen in media free of animal-origin products, motility assays were performed to evaluate if spermatozoa retrieved from epididymides of plains bison can be cryopreserved in Andromed. Interestingly, cyropreserved epididymal spermatozoa had a higher motility than cryopreserved electro-ejaculated sperm after freezing-thawing procedures using a medium containing no products of source animal (respectively, 30% v . 7%). This result suggests that there may be a factor secreted by the reproductive accessory glands that interferes with the post-thaw survivability of bison sperm. In conclusion, this study supports the hypothesis that semen from plains bison behaves similarly to that of wood bison semen during cryopreservation and therefore could be used to establish protocols for advanced reproductive technologies in wood bison. This project was supported by Canadian Adaptation and Rural Development in Saskatchewan.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.047
Threshold uncertainty score0.386

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.077
GPT teacher head0.324
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueReproduction Fertility and DevelopmentSame topicSperm and Testicular FunctionFrench-language works237,207